home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 94 10:57:33 +0100
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 1994 09:55:05 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: [Stephen.Usher@earth.ox.ac.uk: Re: Load average patch for MiNT 1.09.]
- Subject: Re: Load average patch for MiNT 1.09.
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 94 10:57:33 +0100
- Message-Id: <9402110957.AA02576@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
- To: mint@atari.archive.umich.edu
- Subject: [Stephen.Usher@earth.ox.ac.uk: Re: Load average patch for MiNT 1.09.]
-
- From: Stephen Usher <Stephen.Usher@earth.ox.ac.uk>
- Subject: Re: Load average patch for MiNT 1.09.
- To: schwab
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 1994 09:55:05 +0000 (GMT)
- In-Reply-To: <9402110950.AA02543@issan.informatik.uni-dortmund.de> from "Andreas Schwab" at Feb 11, 94 10:50:06 am
- Mime-Version: 1.0
-
- >Stephen Usher <Stephen.Usher@earth.ox.ac.uk> writes:
- >
- >|> BUGS
- >
- >|> The uptime and load average code uses the Vertical Blank Interrupt
- >|> to update its values and assumes that the interrupt will happen
- >|> 60 times per second. This is a false assumption on PAL STs running
- >|> in either ST Low or ST Medium resolutions in which case the uptime
- >|> clock will run slow.
- >
- >It's worse than that, in ST High the frame clock is 72 Hz (on
- >ST/STe's), and the uptime clock will run too fast. You should never
- >make any assumptions about the frequency of the VBI. If you want a
- >reliable clock, use etv_timer.
-
- I could have used the 200Hz interrupt but decided that it'd probably use too
- much CPU time for that. If anyone wishes to modify my patches to give a
- better time accuracy it's fine by me! :-)
-
- Steve
-
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Computer Systems Administrator, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Oxford University.
- E-Mail: steve@uk.ac.ox.earth (JANET) steve@earth.ox.ac.uk (Internet).
- Tel:- Oxford (0865) 282110 (UK) or +44 865 282110 (International).
-
-